Just Say No: Archives

If it’s that important… pick up the phone!

Sam Phillips, June 10th, 2008 10:31 pm

I entered the business world, young and fresh-faced, after 18 years of full-time education that had, when it came to communication, focused on written and in-person verbal. I had become adept at communicating complicated ideas in a written format, and in explaining them in rather less detail in person.

I lesson I learned slowly (as my boss, Ian Cowley will attest) is that, in business, you have to use a tool that you are never really taught to use - the phone.

That might sound stupid, but let me explain. All through school and university, you are expected to submit work in written form, and to be able to prove your ability to describe it in person on occasion. Seminars and tutorials, where most students sit in silence and absorb the knowledge that their colleagues, who have actually done the appropriate preparation, reward those who can talk well and explain effectively. Your main assessment, however, is almost always in some written form.

If you have problem at university, you either go see a tutor, or send him or her and email. Only one lecturer who ever taught me gave out his office phone number and encourage people to ring it - and I bet nobody ever does.

And so generation upon generation of extensively educated people knock on the door of the business world without any formal training in the most basic of skills. I was the same; I’d never used the phone as an interface for business before and was reticent to do so, and I still see a lot of people who seem to be under the impression that text-based communication works well in all circumstances. These people are wrong.

Even the most experienced communicators find it difficult to convey exact meaning and tone in a written form. At work, I frequently get extensive emails that I can’t make head nor tail of, and require a lengthy reply. I’m the fastest typist in our office (with a score of 400+ on this test, without fail, and occasionally 500+), and it will still take me 20 minutes to put together an 800 word email. That’s a lot of time to take away from the serious business of writing code. Often, a 5 minute phone call would knock the whole subject on the head - because nobody types as fast as they talk!

Here is how people should treat communication methods:

Email - good for information-intensive communications that will last a number of days, and will often supplement phone calls. You can’t look up information from a phone call, so for hard data, email is the place. But do yourself a favour; tune your email down to only check the server every 20 minutes or so. This does wonders at reducing the immediacy.

Instant Messenger - good only for very quick questions, and passing around snippets of information. It is impossible to run any sort of business process via this limited medium.

Phone - seems like it takes longer, but is good for actually getting stuff done.

In Person - the very best. Take every opportunity you can to see and experience the people to which you are talking. These conversations are almost always the least guarded and most productive.

So to those people who think that the email is the place for long task descriptions and the phone is simply for quick questions, think again. This is the real world; your long, rambling email is simply not going to be read. Email is fine for a quick question, but if you fancy getting something actually done… pick up the phone.

Oh, and I am so near to putting a filter on my email that automatically deletes anything marked at a priority higher than ‘normal’. I have never, ever, received a ‘high’ priority email that had any right to its lofty status. If it’s that important… pick up the phone.

Moving Google Mail, Calendar, Reader and Talk into Google Apps

Sam Phillips, February 17th, 2008 6:40 pm

For some months, a note has existed on my backpack to blog about moving to Google Apps - to provide what I needed when I moved; a definitive guide. Unfortunately, there have been one or two snags along the way, and I moved my email, my calendar and my google talk account, but with limited success. Here’s some of the tips I picked up along the way, and some of the frustrations for which I await a fix.

Email

My first problem was email. I was moving to Google Apps from a normal Gmail account. The migration was simple - I set up IMAP on the Gmail account and added it as a secondary account on the Google Apps account. This works just fine, although it is slow - very slow. It took nearly a week for all 239 mb of my email to be transferred over. So here’s a top tip - decide you’re going to move, set a date, and some time before that, lay the groundwork by starting this process.

Note: At work, we have used the Google migration tools which are available with more non-free versions. This process was significantly quicker at migrating our current IMAP mailboxes over.

I then switched my old Gmail account to bounce to my new Apps account, and all email bounces through happily while I gradually update the places where that address is stored. This also has the added advantage of filtering some spam out, which is nice, but not really a great concern as Google’s spam filtering is by far the best.

So it’s all going well; my Google toolbar is signed into the Apps account, and I hit the red mail button. Oh dear - it’s asking me to register the email address I’ve just created on Apps as a Google identity for a Gmail account - an account that could never receive email. Fair enough, I thought, and closed the window.

A couple of days later, I installed the Google notifier on my Mac - this worked fine with email being on Apps. The Mac dashboard widget, however, did not. I completed my account details and it complained the account didn’t exist. I clicked through to Google to find that it had set up a new Gmail account for the Apps email address, without even asking. And to add insult to injury, the new account was Gmail 2.0, which I still haven’t had rolled out on any of my Google accounts, at work, at home, anywhere. Wasn’t impressed.

So to summarise; Notifier on Mac works with Apps, Toolbar on Firefox Windows goes mad. And so does the dashboard widget. Clearly, Google is missing a link in some of its products which would allow them to identify and differentiate between Apps and non-Apps services.

Calendar

My migration from normal Google Calendar to Apps Calendar was simple enough - I shared the old calendars with the new account, and will use them for archive purposes. Again, Mac notifier works just fine, again the Firefox Google toolbar failed miserably. Click the calendar icon, and a page opens up:

Oops. A calendar already exists for xxx@xxx.com

(Email address censored by me)

Oops indeed. But don’t worry, Google will bounce you to the right page:

Go to your null calendar

New invitations sent to xxx@xxx.com will be added to this calendar. If you have an account at null, you can sign in at:

http://calendar.google.com/hosted/null

Maybe not. Apparently my null calendar is where it’s at - if I have an account at null, I can access it. Clicking that link (just for amusement, obviously it wasn’t going to work) brings up an error page - an error page that gives a 200 status code, no less. Win.

So it seems that in this instance, Google tried to help me out when I clicked into a calendar that shouldn’t exist, but the good intentions were let down by some buggy code. This is better than mail, which doesn’t realise that an Apps account exists for the domain, but still not perfect.

Reader

Google Apps doesn’t include Reader, so I ended up setting up a normal Google account with my main address on my new Apps domain. Perhaps this is what broke the calendar and mail. Migrating the subscriptions was easy - simply export as OPML on the old account, and import on the new. Done.

IM - GTalk and MSN

I didn’t bother migrating contacts with talk - I just added them again, both in Google talk itself and MSN (having set up my new main address as a M$ Passport). I like this exercise - it allows me to ditch contacts I never speak to. It also provides an interesting acid test - will people add me again? Fortunately, all did. IM was therefore back up and running straight away.

Imified/Twitter - Again, my Imified setup didn’t merit migration. I added the contact in MSN and had it going in a few minutes or so. I also added both Twitter and Imified to my new Apps GTalk account. No love. Not a jot - in fact, this opened up a world of pain.

I tackled the problem from the Twitter angle - basically, for the xmpp/jabber stuff to work with non-google talk services, you have to add some SRV records to your domain, and there’s a few very useful pages out there on sorting this out. To summarise them, at the moment my understanding is that the full SRV breakdown is as follows:

_xmpp-server._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 5 0 5269 xmpp-server.l.google.com.
_xmpp-server._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server1.l.google.com.
_xmpp-server._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server2.l.google.com.
_xmpp-server._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server3.l.google.com.
_xmpp-server._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server4.l.google.com.

_xmpp-client._tcp.yourDomainName.com IN SRV 5 0 5222 talk.l.google.com.
_xmpp-client._tcp.yourDomainName.com IN SRV 20 0 5222 talk1.l.google.com.
_xmpp-client._tcp.yourDomainName.com IN SRV 20 0 5222 talk2.l.google.com.
_xmpp-client._tcp.yourDomainName.com IN SRV 20 0 5222 talk3.l.google.com.
_xmpp-client._tcp.yourDomainName.com IN SRV 20 0 5222 talk4.l.google.com.

_jabber._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 5 0 5269 xmpp-server.l.google.com.
_jabber._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server1.l.google.com.
_jabber._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server2.l.google.com.
_jabber._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server3.l.google.com.
_jabber._tcp.yourDomainName.com. IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server4.l.google.com.

But still, it doesn’t work. Twitter has experienced a lot of technical issues recently, and it’s easy to use a broad brush and suggest this is their fault. But Imified doesn’t work either, and all the debugging suggestions are fruitless.

So that’s it! I can’t get federated services for GTalk to work, and Google seems to be unable to lookup the names of its own Apps domains, meaning you are bounced to strange error pages and Gmail accounts that will never receive mail! But generally, it’s a pretty easy process and for the sake of consolidation, it’s worth it.

Now I just have to get openID working…

MacBook Pro vs MacBook Air

Sam Phillips, January 17th, 2008 7:40 pm

The launch of the MacBook Air this week re-opened a can of worms for me; should my new laptop be a Mac, and now that Air is here, should I choose it over the MacBook Pro which I have previously considered my best choice?

The Mac vs Windows issue is still not solved for me. Ever since my G3, which was found in the lobby of our building with “free to a good owner” taped to it, I have been very impressed with the OSX interface. It is easy to use, and it is progressive. And it does what it does so much better than Windows. The appeal for me was clear.

Of course, Apple’s attack is part cool, part beauty and part ease of use - the latter is what mainly attracts me; but people tend to think of you as gullible if you even suggest that coolness and beauty are something to be attracted to. Yet the fact is that people like me spend a lot of time at computers, and having them be a nice play to be is no bad thing; in fact it’s a great thing. And the fact that they’re ideally suited to web development just adds to the allure.

So what to get? Well, the “same [old] lovable MacBook” isn’t going to cut it, so I’m stuck between Air and Pro. A friend told me I should “go pro, fo’ sho’” (he like me, is so totally ghetto it’s unbelievable), but it’s not that simple. Here’s the comparison in brief:

MacBook Air

  • Light and small.
  • Base processor is a 1.6 Core 2 Duo.
  • 2 gig mem
  • 80 gig hard drive
  • 5 hours batt
  • No SuperDrive
  • 13 inch screen
  • £1,199

Macbook Pro

  • Still pretty light and pretty small.
  • Base processor is a meaty 2.2 Core 2 Duo
  • Extensible 2 gig mem
  • 120 gig hard drive
  • 6 hours bat
  • 15 inch screen
  • SuperDrive
  • £1,299

Until I realised today that the prices were so similar, I was sold on Air. It’s a good deal compared to the pretty (but not as usable) Vaio TX, but it’s clear from the £100 difference that you’re paying for the portability both in terms of cost and in terms of technical specifications. And let’s not forget, when talking of tech specs, that the equivalent Dell laptops are fat, expensive beasts. The bigger Vaio models are nice, but not as nice as Mac. Then again, they are quite a bit cheaper. But they’ll have Vista on them - and the advances that Vista represents over XP are few, especially after you’ve had to turn off all the fancy graphics affects because they overload your system.

So anybody considering buying an Air has to ask themselves “really, how important is the ultra-portability to me”. I think for most people used to lugging around a Windows laptop, the answer will be “not very”, especially considering the improvement in portability that a Pro represents over these clunky machines. If the Air was £800, I would consider it. As it is, it’s MacBook Pro all the way.

Of course, I’ll change my mind again tomorrow. Fo’ sho’. Ho’.

Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

On Twitter:

  1. Loading...

Follow me >

Previously Rejected:

  1. Ten products that Apple just rendered obsolete with iPhone 3G/2.0
  2. Professional Accreditation for Web Professionals (Or, a rant on the British Computer Society)
  3. If it’s that important… pick up the phone!
  4. Moving Google Mail, Calendar, Reader and Talk into Google Apps
  5. I’m sure the makers of BBC iPlayer have been waiting for me to say this…
  6. MacBook Pro vs MacBook Air
  7. The BBC’s rote teaching techniques
  8. Five reasons why you should use SVN for one-man projects
  9. The only limit to identity theft is the thieves themselves
  10. BBC iPlayer: the return of ‘beta’
  11. I eat Wheetos for breakfast. Firefox prefers to gorge on RAM, all day.
  12. Images and subjective influence in online news
  13. Ten Comments on the A List Apart 2007 Web Design Survey
  14. Television is not real; keep it that way.
  15. Radiohead and In Rainbows: Not free, not new.
  1. Bookmarks:

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!